Asrock 880GMH/USB3.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 880GMH/USB3.  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '18 at 10:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 89
44% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 177
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Sapphire(174B E186) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 26.2
22% 25.1 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 27.7
20% 23.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 41 39 42 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 92.9
Write 92.7
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 37.5
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 54%
SAMSUNG HM320JI 320GB
225GB free, PID 0214
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 21.2
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 23.4
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.5% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GMH/USB3. Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GMH/USB3.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback