Samsung 270E5G/270E5U

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 47% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 270E5G/270E5U (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E5G-KD2BR
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '18 at 00:59
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	86%
CPU Throttled	47%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	26.1% Poor	Memory 44.5 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 36.2 24% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 44 8-Core 69.3 7% 56.7 Pts	64-Core 60.8 4% 60.8 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C736) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 2% 2.86 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 39 15 48 110 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 299 Write 210 Mixed 199 SusWrite 84.7 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 10.2 34% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 56.2 DQ Mixed 29.3 37% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQR 1x8GB 1,144 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 270E5G/270E5U Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 270E5G/270E5U

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	71x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	32x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	118x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	22x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
THNSFC128GBSJ 128GBToshibaBench 36%, 469 samples	3x

RAM
SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQR 1x8GBSmartBench 28%, 1,144 samples	52x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	22x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16