TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 19:19
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 241
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 962
85% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 82.2%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3602)
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2927 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 198
Parallax 198
151% 194 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 177
Splatting 127
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 131%
 Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 396 459 470 471 468 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 465
Mixed 417
SusWrite 436
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 41.9
138% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 41.5
84% 161 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 99.6%
 Great: 127%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
238GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 399 461 471 471 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 468
Mixed 330
SusWrite 439
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 42.2
155% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 39.3
36% 54 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 95.3%
 Great: 106%
WD Passport X 25BD 2TB
2TB free, PID 25bd
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 108
127% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 44.8%
 Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 26.7
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 83.4%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD  $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples280x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples206x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples191x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples196x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples159x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples116x
SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $102Bench 310%, 455,997 samples54x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples42x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback