Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 12:35
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 902
87% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 47
Reflection 54.2
Parallax 44.1
38% 48.4 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 47
Splatting 61.3
48% 58.5 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct2000mx 50 2TB
969GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 437 445 455 456 455 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 471
Mixed 425
SusWrite 450
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 58.2
199% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 294
239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 126%
Great: 113%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
40GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 475 464 475 475 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 491
Mixed 418
SusWrite 472
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 68.8
236% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 138%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 619 629 627 626 621 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,090
Write 1,716
Mixed 869
SusWrite 666
297% 1,335 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 70
309% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 1,319
DQ Mixed 871
750% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 271%
Great: 254%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 106 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 108
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB-$420
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 1400 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 58.9
MC Mixed 51.8
159% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 28.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 48.3
83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 143%
Great: 157%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback