Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 138%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 12:35
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
SC Int 133
SC Float 132
SC Mixed 134
106% 133 Pts
QC Int 532
QC Float 534
QC Mixed 531
121% 533 Pts
MC Int 997
MC Float 1,089
MC Mixed 1,061
157% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$713
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (141 fps cap detected)
52.5% Above average
Lighting 141
Reflection 141
Parallax 141
44% 141 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 141
Splatting 141
59% 141 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 177%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ct2000mx 50 2TB
969GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 437 445 455 456 455 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
126% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 471
Mixed 425
SusWrite 450
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 58.2
199% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 294
239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 127%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$98
40GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 475 464 475 475 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 491
Mixed 418
SusWrite 472
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 68.8
236% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 138%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$150
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 619 629 627 626 621 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,090
Write 1,716
Mixed 869
SusWrite 666
297% 1,335 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 70
309% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 1,319
DQ Mixed 871
750% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 271%
Great: 256%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 106 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 108
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB-$751
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 1400 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 58.9
MC Mixed 51.8
159% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 28.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 48.3
83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 143%
Great: 163%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback