Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 06:50
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$208
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 284
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 899
88% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,199
74% 1,199 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1370 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 85.5
57% 71.6 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 74.7
53% 63.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 390 395 391 393 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 398
Mixed 272
SusWrite 394
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 39
153% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 322
244% 327 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
132GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 75 73 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 112
Write 95.7
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 75.4
69% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
38GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 68 67 69 70 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 99.2
Write 97.3
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 72.3
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
530GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 70
Mixed 66
SusWrite 67.9
51% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
11GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 11 11 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 124
Write 25
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 14.9
58% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.5
231% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 28.3
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 30.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,065
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback