Lenovo 81H9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81H9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180802
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '18 at 19:15
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 551
60% 473 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Legend(17AA 39FF) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: NDA
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 17.7
11% 15.3 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 13
Splatting 17.9
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDHTNG-8310A 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 321 314 310 319 304 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 969
Write 581
Mixed 424
SusWrite 328
128% 575 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 39.1
128% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 526
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 391
318% 451 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 120%
Great: 148%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 197GB
183GB free, PID 0723
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 20
Write 17.5
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 17.4
25% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.7
236% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.1
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81H9 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81H9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback