Fujitsu CELSIUS W380

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W380  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2917-A1
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 03 '16 at 18:54
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 139
56% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 838C) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.86% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 13
Parallax 9.34
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 15.1
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
463GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 63.8
Mixed 75
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.37
91% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 65.6
Write 66
Mixed 62
49% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.42
106% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 13.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W380 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback