HP h8-1207eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h8-1207eo  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120105
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 10:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$127
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 471
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
HP(103C 6886) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 22.4
13% 18.2 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 18.4
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA5R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 23 26 28 26 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 122
Write 28.5
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 24.4
37% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 99%
Freecom Public-Disk 1TB
389GB free, PID fc95
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 10.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 85.2
59% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Ramaxel RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Ramaxel RMR1870EC58E9F1333 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1207eo Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP h8-1207eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback