Acer Predator PH317-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH317-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienna_CFS
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 08:22
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 143
60% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 391
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1266) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 6.09
5% 28.8 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 12.7
8% 8.95 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 101 116 114 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 431
Write 127
Mixed 152
SusWrite 116
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 18.7
87% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 119
118% 196 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 70%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
894GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 108 107 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 116
Write 102
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 111
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.7
268% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 79%
USB Mass Storage Device 16GB
11GB free, PID 123a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.9 7.2 6.2 7.6 7.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7
9% 7.85 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
96% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.3% Above average
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.8
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-52 Builds (Compare 1,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback