Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5638 31 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 101 51% 78.3 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 329 33% 266 Pts	64-Core 755 47% 755 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 47.2 29% 38.5 fps	MRender 46.6 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 33.8 33% 41 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 31%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 2TB 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 323 310 320 282 292 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 82GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.3% Average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 19.2 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.8 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	276x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	255x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87