Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1597c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p7-1597c  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 17:52
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 311
43% 317 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 130 109 126 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 145
Write 121
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 130
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$130
730GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 71 73 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 90.5
Write 69.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 75.4
47% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 22.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 27.9
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
185% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1597c Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1597c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback