Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 16:22
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 162
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 572
54% 450 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 49.1
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 40.6
40% 40.9 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 38.7
33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCSi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 158 172 171 170 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 291
Write 196
Mixed 234
SusWrite 162
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 33
126% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 220
170% 234 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 88%
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$60
261GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 75 74 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 62.2
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 73.6
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
137GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 33
Write 25.9
Mixed 22
SusWrite 26.2
35% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 44%
ASMedia AS2115 750GB
463GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 25.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 25.2
35% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G1A2 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 30.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 21
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback