Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '18 at 15:33
Run Duration	325 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90 3,733 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 76.9 1-Core 50.4 2-Core 101 48% 76.1 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 151 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2382 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.7% Poor	Lighting 11.8 Reflection 8.88 Parallax 71.8 10% 30.8 fps	MRender 88.4 Gravity 77.8 Splatting 76.9 66% 81 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 135 130 134 135 133 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 217 Write 202 Mixed 170 SusWrite 142 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 23.5 86% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 32.9 DQ Write 74.5 DQ Mixed 41.5 35% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 110%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB 40,989 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 226GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 87 86 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 85.5 Write 83.6 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 85.6 55% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-067.A00LF 2x4GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.9% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 86.4 46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GM-GS3 FX Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	9x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	3x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Savage 240GBHyperX $117Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 2,338 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $316

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16