Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '18 at 09:30
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$120 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 121 2-Core 241 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 542 64% 493 Pts	64-Core 619 38% 619 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.3% Above average	Lighting 63.3 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 55.2 52% 60.5 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 61.1 51% 62.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 34 143 23 45 97 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 350 Write 298 Mixed 263 SusWrite 83 56% 248 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 20.2 102% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 132 128% 197 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 297GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 91 92 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 114 Write 119 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 91.5 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB 32,519 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 12.2 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 13.1 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $180Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,527x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	838x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	579x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	405x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	348x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	343x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	148x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $634

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16