Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170915
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '18 at 13:49
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 201 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 762 72% 595 Pts	64-Core 991 61% 991 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.9% Very good	Lighting 96.3 Reflection 104 Parallax 107 78% 103 fps	MRender 88.9 Gravity 92.9 Splatting 80.7 71% 87.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 494 Write 259 Mixed 304 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 41.7 144% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 294 220% 293 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3250820NS 250GB-$107 252 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 151GB free Firmware: 3.AEE SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 66 66 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 71.5 Write 69.5 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 66.1 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 44%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 244GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 71 70 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	41% Average	Read 70.2 Write 68.5 Mixed 59 SusWrite 72 50% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB 1,302 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 45.1 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 43 126% 44 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 22.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	559x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	528x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	470x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	216x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $859

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16