Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160316
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '18 at 04:18
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$71 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 175 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 376 51% 378 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6393) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 192 Parallax 179 123% 174 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 182 Splatting 127 118% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 36GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 311 234 91 89 93 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 435 Write 422 Mixed 369 SusWrite 192 80% 354 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 57.5 196% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 325 246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 133 133 134 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 127 Write 124 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 131 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FH 2x8GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 20.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 18.8 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $85Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	595x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	464x
Core i5-6400Intel $71Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	462x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	562x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	401x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	241x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	195x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	133x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	92x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $410

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16