Apple iMac15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemApple iMac15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-FA842E06C61E91C5
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '18 at 03:05
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 636
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M295X (Bootcamp XG edition by bootcampdrivers.com)
Apple(106B 013A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.10.3
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
8.23% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 15.3
9% 12.7 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 8.17
7% 8.22 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 30%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD ST3000DM001 3TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 144 101 90 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 167
Write 158
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 132
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314736453220 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac15,1 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Apple iMac15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback