Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '18 at 21:22
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 157
2-Core 314
104% 189 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 867
83% 686 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 122
Parallax 104
94% 114 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 105
Splatting 107
86% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 238 223 212 204 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2,148
Write 1,201
Mixed 590
SusWrite 282
231% 1,055 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 55.5
235% 93.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,066
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 893
713% 996 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 220%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
20GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9829
Write 9,130
Mixed 9,130
2,091% 9,363 MB/s
4K Read 615
4K Write 337
4K Mixed 394
1,615% 448 MB/s
DQ Read 1,552
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,236
962% 1,329 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung HD103SI 120GB
20GB free
Firmware: 1.3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 120 132 129 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.4% Excellent
Read 403
Write 152
Mixed 202
SusWrite 125
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 42.4
167% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 162
123% 166 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3020 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 26.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 30.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 50.1
80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,147
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback