Medion Erazer P6679 MD60382

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive1.22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMedion Erazer P6679 MD60382  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D15KHN
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime17.7 Days
Run DateSep 01 '18 at 18:01
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 145
55% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 234
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Device(1B0A 22CD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9907
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 16.6
12% 12.3 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 20
Splatting 15.6
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFD00.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2 63 1.2 1.2 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.22% Terrible
Read 4.2
Write 115
Mixed 2
SusWrite 11.6
8% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.1
1% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
832GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 103 99 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 97.7
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 103
59% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer P6679 MD60382 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6679 MD60382

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback