Apple MacPro3,1

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Apple MacPro3,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F42C88C8
Memory	20.3 GB free of 26 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080229
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '18 at 01:00
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5462 772 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 40.2 2-Core 79.3 41% 63 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 263 25% 208 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.1% Poor	Lighting 30.5 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 35.4 25% 31.2 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 36.2 Splatting 30.9 28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 99 106 106 111 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.7% Above average	Read 220 Write 217 Mixed 205 SusWrite 99.3 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 38.4 125% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 38.4 DQ Write 80.1 DQ Mixed 48 40% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 126%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 232GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 66 65 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 65.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 65.5 46% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 446GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 95 108 108 107 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 162 Write 151 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 104 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 222% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 907GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 32 Write 24.7 Mixed 24 SusWrite 18.8 32% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 21%
WDC WD64 01AALS-00L3B2 640GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 124GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 22 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 18.5 31% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 26GB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 38% null MHz 1024, 1024, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.4% Poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro3,1

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E54621stBench 47%, 772 samples	98x
Xeon E5462IntelBench 48%, 662 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	22x
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples	11x
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	28x
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	25x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16