Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '18 at 19:51
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 88 2-Core 165 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 396 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 82FD) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.15% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 0.84 2% 2.63 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.15% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB 15,968 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 56 59 58 57 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.9% Poor	Read 172 Write 96.8 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 57.7 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 10.1 42% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 10.6 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 16.4 12% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 99%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 124GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 57 60 59 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 88.4 Write 60.8 Mixed 71.1 SusWrite 58.7 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 83%
Toshiba MC04ACA400E 4TB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 233GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 103 104 105 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	60% Good	Read 105 Write 104 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 103 67% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	94x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	72x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	161x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	119x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16