Asus STRIX Z270I GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 29 '18 at 02:11
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 155
2-Core 309
103% 187 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 855
90% 720 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2315 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.7
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 76
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 73.8
62% 74.6 fps
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 74.7
65% 73.3 fps
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.03% Terrible
Lighting 8.33
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 8.44
7% 9.62 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 16.7
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.03%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$175
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 509 508 511 506 513 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 856
Write 840
Mixed 870
SusWrite 528
174% 773 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 52.7
190% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 814
614% 826 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 162%
Great: 162%
Intel Optane+3.6TBHDD
3TB free
Firmware: 16.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 6 7.5 13 6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7% Terrible
Read 5.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 7.4
1% 6.12 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 6.5
20% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 7%
Great: 120%
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
86GB free
Firmware: DC8110E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 416 398 416 414 400 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 406
Mixed 306
SusWrite 399
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 40.3
147% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 215
193% 293 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
8GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 487
Mixed 378
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60
205% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung SM841 mSATA 256GB
189GB free
Firmware: DXM43D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 409 416 411 407 411 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 399
Write 412
Mixed 292
SusWrite 399
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 32.9
150% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 121
137% 232 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 27.3
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 30
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 47.2
85% 47.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270I GAMING Builds (Compare 952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270I GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $734
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback