MSI Z97S SLI PLUS (MS-7930)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7930
MotherboardMSI Z97S SLI PLUS (MS-7930)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 21:26
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 229
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 425
59% 436 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.5% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 113
Parallax 96
83% 104 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 95.7
Splatting 101
81% 98.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,000
Write 1,487
Mixed 556
296% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 45.8
172% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 650
523% 737 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
20GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 201 202 204 202 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 450
Write 203
Mixed 197
SusWrite 201
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 12.8
90% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 79.4
91% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 78%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB
54GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 55 48 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 160
Write 145
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 51
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.6
330% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 116%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
454GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 149 152 153 149 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 86
Write 141
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 151
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 107%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
248GB free
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 77 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 72.7
Write 69.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 75.9
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 57%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 322GB
30GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 57 58 55 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 120
Write 111
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 57.4
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.3
262% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 165%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.7
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97S SLI PLUS (MS-7930) Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97S SLI PLUS (MS-7930) - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback