Asus G750JX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus G750JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JX
Memory13.2 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 15:45
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 180
62% 136 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 494
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 40% Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M
Asus(1043 213E) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 23.6
17% 20.9 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 19.3
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 155 61 61 142 181 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 260
Write 64.5
Mixed 102
SusWrite 123
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 18.1
80% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 67.8
DQ Mixed 51.7
79% 158 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST750LM000-1EJ16G 750GB
224GB free
Firmware: AS11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 107
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 105
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
364% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JX Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback