Asrock P67 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '16 at 00:20
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 228
85% 147 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 597
64% 511 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gigabyte(1458 3554) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 24.8
16% 20.8 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 17
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 397
Write 272
Mixed 252
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 9.49
70% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 40.5
DQ Mixed 9.62
13% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 54%
Great: 108%
OCZ AGILITY2 40GB
37GB free
Firmware: 1.11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 119
Write 46.4
Mixed 65.7
17% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 8.09
55% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 52.5
DQ Mixed 8.57
15% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25%
Great: 44%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
177GB free
Firmware: 21.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 49.4
Write 57.9
Mixed 48.3
39% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.33
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600+ 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 19.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme6 - $202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback