Sony SVE1713L1EB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSony SVE1713L1EB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20120313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 01:37
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 87.5
1-Core 91
2-Core 129
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 192
21% 164 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 451 453 450 460 454 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 393
Mixed 331
SusWrite 455
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 58
193% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 266
214% 304 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
ST332061 3AS 320GB
105GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 25.6
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 14.5
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11%
Great: 14%
Hitachi HTS543216A7A384 160GB
3GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 23.2
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 14.5
28% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 11%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
22GB free, PID a83a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 24
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 10.9
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
102% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback