Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '18 at 21:05
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRO-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 132
2-Core 270
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 875
85% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74% Very good
Lighting 90.2
Reflection 102
Parallax 89
74% 93.8 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 92.8
Splatting 92.6
75% 91.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 99 124 110 103 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 246
Write 148
Mixed 170
SusWrite 107
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 37.9
135% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 124
96% 130 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
555GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 412 381 462 465 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 452
Mixed 415
SusWrite 424
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 58.7
193% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
963GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 123 124 121 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 127
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 124
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 104 110 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 103
Write 75.5
Mixed 81
SusWrite 108
124% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FDD2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 18
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback