Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171017
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 27 '18 at 11:04
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 202
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 400
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 34.1
28% 31.5 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 33
Splatting 23.4
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
617GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 93 90 98 96 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 78
Write 99.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 93.4
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$7
25GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 73
Mixed 91
116% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.3
238% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143SB1-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 24.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback