Asus B250M-BASALT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B250M-BASALT  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '18 at 03:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 202
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 362
52% 381 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 133
Parallax 114
98% 122 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 119
Splatting 100
86% 105 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 300 351 358 351 349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 461
Write 300
Mixed 156
SusWrite 331
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 14.5
112% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 85.8
105% 180 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
776GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 173 171 176 152 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 166
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 168
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-142.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M-BASALT Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B250M-BASALT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback