Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140409
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateAug 26 '18 at 10:24
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 125
56% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 301
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 39
26% 33.9 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 34.6
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 135 135 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 400
Mixed 286
SusWrite 160
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 44.7
155% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 144
137% 214 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
456GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 132 132 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 123
Write 126
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 132
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 77%
Toshiba MK3259GSXPW 320GB
271GB free
Firmware: GT001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 84 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 81.2
Write 82.7
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 82.8
48% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback