Lenovo 2552C46

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2552C46  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 16:40
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 176
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 352
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 32
28% 30.8 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 32.5
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qumox 240GB SSD 240GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 213 104 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 384
Write 367
Mixed 280
SusWrite 130
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 10.9
64% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 19.7
49% 101 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
283GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 114 113 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 106
Write 46.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 108
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 88%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.1 4.5 5.3 4.4 5.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 1.3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.5
8% 8.47 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 8%
Imation Nano Pro 16GB
12GB free, PID 063a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.7 6.6 6.2 6.5 5.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 5.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.4
10% 9 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.9
57% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 9%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.1 3.4 3.8 4.8 5.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 0.8
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 3.8
7% 7.67 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2552C46 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2552C46

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback