TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H87-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 00:13
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 176
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 335
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 69.9%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.2% Below average
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 39.4
30% 36.3 fps
MRender 51.4
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 36.3
36% 45 fps
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 32.2%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 209 211 226 223 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 432
Write 426
Mixed 314
SusWrite 214
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 24.9
120% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 139
142% 226 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 78.2%
 Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
537GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 153 154 154 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 155
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 154
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 92.7%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1319 CL9-9-9 D3-1600 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 51.2%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples152x
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples70x
Core i5-4670Intel  $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples56x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples34x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples33x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples16x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung  $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples15x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples21x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples19x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback