Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M5910 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M5910
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '18 at 18:55
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 73.3 2-Core 120 61% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 178 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5850 15,020 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Sapphire(174B E150) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 9.77 Parallax 19.9 18% 17.3 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 15.6 Splatting 15.7 12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 280GB free (System drive) Firmware: ST6O Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 1.5 Mixed 0.7 1% 1.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB 633 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 13.8 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11.4 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	68x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	12x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	9x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
X150 480GBEmtecBench 75%, 1,954 samples	7x

RAM
CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 7 samples	7x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 12GBUnknownBench 35%, 7 samples	6x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $301

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16