Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 13:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 94.8
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 129
64% 100 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 469
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 7.91
8% 9.27 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 7.07
Splatting 9.7
7% 8.78 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX300-120 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 227 226 231 230 230 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 455
Write 338
Mixed 324
SusWrite 235
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 25
118% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 89.1
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 24.7
59% 118 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
139GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 121 121 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 180
Write 148
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 124
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 14.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback