Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 23 '18 at 17:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 116
55% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 250
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Gigabyte(1458 2551) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.1% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 13.5
8% 12.9 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 8.83
Splatting 16.7
11% 12.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 81 59 87 74 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 84.5
Write 82.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 75.8
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
217GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 131 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 153
Write 135
Mixed 68
SusWrite 131
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback