PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160307 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 23 '18 at 00:05 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
74.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
|
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 7 31 21 19 31 MB/s
|
26.6%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
551GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 192 190 192 192 192 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
SRT USB 8GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.1 5.1 5 5.7 5.2 MB/s
|
9.11%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
75%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 431x |
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 196x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 156x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 150x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 145x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 129x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 108% - Outstanding | Total price: $311 |