Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160322
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 25 '16 at 23:43
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 118
2-Core 253
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 780
79% 639 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 47.2
Reflection 45
Parallax 39.4
38% 43.9 fps
Gravity 6.83
Splatting 9.43
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 30% Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OACY0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 102
Mixed 97.4
75% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.15
64% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%
ASUSTek WHD-A1 1TB
763GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 85.4
Write 73.2
Mixed 28.3
73% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.2
23% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 34%
General USB Flash Disk 129GB
29GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 68.3
Write 34.4
Mixed 44.2
57% 49 MB/s
4K Read 4.75
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.48
54% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 33%
General 4GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 5.35
Mixed 5.07
9% 8.24 MB/s
4K Read 6.39
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.003
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 34.8
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback