Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120919
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 22 '18 at 09:19
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 169
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 286
42% 304 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB; AMD RX 570 Nitro
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 74.3
49% 67.2 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 54.6
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 191 187 192 189 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 479
Write 213
Mixed 230
SusWrite 191
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 31.3
114% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 272
212% 296 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
234GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 158 161 160 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 143
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 160
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
199GB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 27.6
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 8.1
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.9
231% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 104%
Intenso M2M 500GB
55GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Read 32.3
Write 27.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 7.7
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 41%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
269GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.7 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 27.6
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 7.7
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 250GB
226GB free, PID 3000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Read 30
Write 24.3
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 7.6
27% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 17%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB
210GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 65.4
Write 65.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 67.6
85% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 32%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 240GB
40GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 32.9
Write 27.4
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 7.7
31% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 7.6
560% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 79%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
171GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 34 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 32.6
Mixed 23
SusWrite 33.5
41% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M1A1600C11 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77M-D3H Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback