Asus M5A78L-M LX V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LX V2  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '18 at 20:53
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 133
62% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 302
36% 280 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3264) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 30.8
21% 28 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 32.6
22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 111 110 115 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 139
Write 135
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 110
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 85%
ST330082 2AS 300GB
45GB free, PID 070c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
9.89% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 10.7
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 15.9
21% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.89%
Great: 17%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1TB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 15 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Read 24
Write 24.6
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 14.2
28% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LX V2 Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback