Asus Z170-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '16 at 12:35
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 284
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 810
85% 684 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 46.2
Reflection 51.3
Parallax 60.4
38% 52.6 fps
MRender 51.1
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 39.9
36% 43.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,189
Write 841
Mixed 1,032
227% 1,021 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 48.4
206% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 140
150% 251 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 175%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
104GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 412
Mixed 418
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 41.4
164% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 101
132% 243 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
93GB free
Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 353
Write 119
Mixed 197
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 4.73
93% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 17.9
54% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
726GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 129
Write 137
Mixed 126
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 0.25
119% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 155
Mixed 146
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.33
103% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 26.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 26.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-PRO Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-PRO - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback