HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1850
Memory	7.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180322
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '18 at 01:17
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 53.4 2-Core 95.7 46% 72.3 Pts	4-Core 98.4 8-Core 96.9 13% 97.7 Pts	64-Core 95.7 6% 95.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.5% Below average	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 30 Parallax 32.6 30% 33.3 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 36.7 31% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 45 59 76 114 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 76.5 Write 115 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 82.4 62% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS542512K9S 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 15GB free, PID 0700 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 33 33 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.5% Very poor	Read 33.9 Write 33.6 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 32.6 41% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
S M U V K A H H 10GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.7% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 8.3 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 MT Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

CPU
A8-5500B APUAMDBench 48%, 2,596 samples	42x
A4-5300B APUAMDBench 39%, 2,157 samples	14x
A6-5400B APUAMDBench 41%, 1,193 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	29x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	12x
Radeon HD 7540DAMDBench 3%, 4,337 samples	12x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	6x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBHBench 28%, 88 samples	4x
M 2x4GBSBench 28%, 164 samples	3x
1x4GBHBench 22%, 243 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16