Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 20 '18 at 21:07
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 243
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 467
59% 447 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 90.8
Parallax 161
90% 121 fps
MRender 88.9
Gravity 115
Splatting 128
93% 111 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT48D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 167 148 155 148 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 489
Write 182
Mixed 169
SusWrite 157
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 32.3
145% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 82.4
113% 212 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 85%
Great: 83%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
37GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 109 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.8% Good
Read 259
Write 250
Mixed 225
SusWrite 110
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 37.7
140% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 137
119% 176 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 91%
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
53GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 87 87 87 89 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 506
Write 453
Mixed 351
SusWrite 111
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 39.5
150% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 177
182% 296 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
61GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 106 107 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 169
Write 144
Mixed 81
SusWrite 105
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
684GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 188 186 186 183 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 151
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 186
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 0420 F3-1866C9-8GXM 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback