Asus Z97-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateApr 24 '16 at 14:52
Run Duration449 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 96.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 243
89% 156 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 619
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 6.06
6% 6.06 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 6.87
5% 5.96 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 91GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 994
Write 204
Mixed 290
107% 496 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 9.32
95% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 43.3
71% 134 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 87%
Great: 90%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 149GB
8GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 729
Write 186
Mixed 281
86% 399 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 14.4
51% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 77.6
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 28.9
30% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 64%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
324GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 119
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.27
102% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
140GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 54.6
Write 57
Mixed 50.9
41% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.17
47% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32%
Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
12GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 26.8
Write 3.05
Mixed 5.99
11% 12 MB/s
4K Read 3.21
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.3
40% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 21.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-PRO Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO - $215

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $857
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback