Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 11:27
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 98.2
1-Core 155
2-Core 311
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 503
71% 523 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 145
Parallax 123
106% 133 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 127
Splatting 107
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 783 636 650 541 560 563 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,114
Write 807
Mixed 665
SusWrite 622
179% 802 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 57.4
207% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 581
461% 640 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 176%
Great: 185%
Dogfish SSD120G 120GB
92GB free
Firmware: Q0601B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 64 65 70 65 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 431
Write 307
Mixed 318
SusWrite 98.7
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 19.6
119% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 29.9
74% 150 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 70%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
117GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 249 246 245 245 245 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 446
Write 256
Mixed 162
SusWrite 247
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 20.3
101% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 57.6
104% 209 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
69GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72% Very good
Read 465
Write 136
Mixed 131
SusWrite 132
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 20.4
120% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 51
85% 170 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
372GB free
Firmware: CC56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 161 161 155 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 154
Write 161
Mixed 87
SusWrite 159
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 51.7
MC Mixed 40.4
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 52
SC Mixed 33.4
105% 36.7 GB/s
Latency 45.1
89% 45.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback