Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 00:30
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 192
81% 136 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 521
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.3% Above average
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 70.4
61% 73.4 fps
MRender 76.3
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 61.4
55% 68.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc SSD162 240GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 156 150 164 133 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 399
Write 216
Mixed 220
SusWrite 154
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 42.4
155% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 165
145% 218 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 90%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
6GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 286
Write 294
Mixed 229
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 30.5
106% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 125
106% 156 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Spcc SSD162 240GB
16GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 160 151 151 152 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 403
Write 177
Mixed 203
SusWrite 152
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 20
73% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 79.3
69% 106 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
9GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 297
Write 295
Mixed 268
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 35.3
115% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 143
106% 141 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Elements 1TB
149GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 18 23 21 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 19
Write 16.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 20.9
25% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 2TB
17GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 27 25 23 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 21.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 22.9
25% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $730
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback