HP ENVY x360 m6 Convertible

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP ENVY x360 m6 Convertible  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 806D
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160812
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 00:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 45.7
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 39.2
25% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 50.3
8-Core 60.7
7% 55.5 Pts
64-Core 64.3
4% 64.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 806D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 8.04
Parallax 6.94
4% 6.84 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.57
5% 5.89 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 379 391 370 391 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 410
Write 404
Mixed 388
SusWrite 371
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 27.6
90% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 180
134% 178 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP691160-H66-MCN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY x360 m6 Convertible Builds (Compare 597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY x360 m6 Convertible

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback