HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 250 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EF
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 22:02
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 95.1
53% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 166
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 81EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.97
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 9.04
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 240GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 94 94 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 440
Write 291
Mixed 253
SusWrite 97.7
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 25.3
101% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 90.1
DQ Mixed 114
95% 140 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 91%
SDHC Card 8GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.8 4.3 4.3 4.8 4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 4.1
7% 6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 15.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback