Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime44.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 15:30
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2675QM
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 103
50% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 260
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 2.38
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 161 329 350 352 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 21.3
Write 294
Mixed 272
SusWrite 277
50% 216 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 17.3
61% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 126
96% 131 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-101.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback