Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Gold 6142 27 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 115 2-Core 224 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 836 76% 638 Pts	64-Core 2,212 137% 2,212 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.58 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Lighting 86.3 Reflection 92.3 Parallax 90 70% 89.5 fps	MRender 89.3 Gravity 84.3 Splatting 91.6 73% 88.4 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1028 1029 798 599 598 599 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,148 Write 1,046 Mixed 612 SusWrite 775 201% 895 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 48.4 183% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1142 DQ Write 1,024 DQ Mixed 796 676% 987 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 254%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43CB1-CRC 6x16GB 6 of 12 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	148% Outstanding	MC Read 56.3 MC Write 73.3 MC Mixed 55.3 176% 61.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 9.6 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 80%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

CPU
Xeon Gold 6148IntelBench 75%, 77 samples	5x
Xeon Gold 6134IntelBench 80%, 93 samples	2x
Xeon Silver 4114IntelBench 65%, 539 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $246Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	3x
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
500GB SSD 500GBLexarBench 172%, 5,765 samples	3x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $73Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	2x
SM2280S3G2240G 240GBKingstonBench 81%, 3,414 samples	1x

RAM
M393A4K40BB1-CRC 6x31.8GBSamsungBench 109%, 18 samples	4x
M393A2K43DB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 61%, 10 samples	2x
M393A4K40BB1-CRC 12x31.9GBSamsungBench 112%, 9 samples	1x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $246