Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 20:58
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 131
60% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 355
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 39.7
27% 34.8 fps
MRender 43.9
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 35.1
32% 39 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1222A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 120 76 9.8 47 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 486
Write 394
Mixed 365
SusWrite 76
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 0.6
79% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 86.1
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 0.7
13% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 99%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
29GB free
Firmware: 5.0.2a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 103 102 107 106 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.5% Average
Read 158
Write 134
Mixed 128
SusWrite 105
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 30.3
110% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 34.8
34% 53 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
368GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 142 144 145 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 127
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 137
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDT721050SLA360 500GB-$66
409GB free
Firmware: ST3OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 106
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 102
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback